翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ R v Smith (1900)
・ R v Smith (1987)
・ R v Smith (1992)
・ R v Smith (Thomas Joseph)
・ R v Soqokomashe
・ R v Sparrow
・ R v Spencer
・ R v Starr
・ R v Steane
・ R v Stephens
・ R v Stevens
・ R v Steyn
・ R v Stillman
・ R v Stinchcombe
・ R v Stone
R v Storrey
・ R v Strachan
・ R v Suberu
・ R v Sullivan
・ R v Sullivan (Canada)
・ R v Sussex Justices, ex p McCarthy
・ R v Swain
・ R v Symonds
・ R v Tang
・ R v Terry
・ R v Tessling
・ R v Therens
・ R v Thomas
・ R v Thomas Equipment Ltd
・ R v Tse


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

R v Storrey : ウィキペディア英語版
R v Storrey

''R v Storrey'' () 1 S.C.R. 241 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the authority of police officers to make an arrest. The Court added another requirement that, in addition to an officer's subjective belief that there are reasonable and probable grounds for arrest, the grounds must be justifiable from an objective point of view.
In his judgement, Cory J. followed R v Brown (1987 NSCA) and Liversidge v Anderson in stating:〔(canlii.org: R. v. Storrey, (1990) 1 SCR 241, 1990 CanLII 125 (SCC) )〕
:''...the Criminal Code requires that an arresting officer must subjectively have reasonable and probable grounds on which to base the arrest. Those grounds must, in addition, be justifiable from an objective point of view. That is to say, a reasonable person placed in the position of the officer must be able to conclude that there were indeed reasonable and probable grounds for the arrest. On the other hand, the police need not demonstrate anything more than reasonable and probable grounds. Specifically they are not required to establish a prima facie case for conviction before making the arrest.''
==References==


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「R v Storrey」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.